Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do?
Lecture Seven
PART ONE: A LESSON IN LYING
Immanuel Kants stringent theory of
morality allows for no exceptions. Kant believed that telling a lie,
even a white lie, is a violation of ones own dignity. Professor Sandel
asks students to test Kants theory with this hypothetical case: if your
friend were hiding inside your home, and a person intent on killing
your friend came to your door and asked you where he was, would it be
wrong to tell a lie? If so, would it be moral to try to mislead the
murderer without actually lying? This leads to a discussion of the
morality of misleading truths. Sandel wraps up the lecture with a video
clip of one of the most famous, recent examples of dodging the truth:
President Clinton talking about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
PART TWO: A DEAL IS A DEAL
Sandel introduces the modern
philosopher John Rawls and his theory of a hypothetical social
contract. Rawls argues that principles of justice are the outcome of a
special kind of agreement. They are the principles we would all agree
to if we had to choose rules for our society and no one had any unfair
bargaining power. According to Rawls, the only way to ensure that no
one has more power than anyone else is to imagine a scenario where no
one knows his or her age, sex, race, intelligence, strength, social
position, family wealth, religion, or even his or her goals in life.
Rawls calls this hypothetical situation a veil of ignorance. What
principles would we agree to behind this veil of ignorance? And would
these principles be fair? Professor Sandel explains the idea of a fair
agreement with some humorous examples of actual contracts that produce
unfair results.